21 November 2024

And you thought my incessant Facebook posts are a bad thing?

I arrived in Newark airport and eventually found my way to the airport hotel. About 400 yards as the crow flies. But it took me an hour in two buses and one train to get there. Finished up my dinner at the bar and was on my way up to the room to get a good night’s rest.

I have two days worth of driving Natasha and Tuey back home in front of me.

On the way up, I got distracted by some stuff in the library corner of the hotel. There was an illuminated globe there. Sharmila loves globes. So, I went up to take a closer look. Loved what I saw. I was wondering if Sharmila might want a bigger one or was this size enough? Unfortunately, I could not estimate the size properly. Yes, the globe always being at an angle was not helping.

Did the next best thing. You know how hotels near airports have printers to print your boarding pass? Grabbed a paper from that. I knew the dimensions of standard US Letter size paper. From that I could establish the size of the globe. (Please do not say 8,000 miles 🙂 )

I could have gone to my room from there. But I stood there looking for globes in Amazon on my phone. Had I not done that, the most important part of the evening would not have happened…

Five minutes into my browsing Amazon standing in the corner of the hotel lobby, I heard a familiar “Rajib Roy?”. Looked up and saw two distinctly Indian looking gentlemen approaching me. Their faces looked familiar but for the life of me, I could not remember their names.

“Yes,” I confirmed.

“Vasuki!”, he put me at ease!

Of course, it was Vasuki – from the 90s in i2 when I worked in Dallas! I had heard stories of his great career progression from Madhav but I do not think I had seen him in over a couple of decades.

“And this is Chaitanya Pai”.

Immediately, I remembered a young gentleman from early 2000s working at a desk in Munich. We worked in Infineon for quite some time. Turns out he still lives in Germany!

What a brilliant coincidence! We sat down in the nearest sofa and caught up on so many of our old friends and their own families. Both now work with some of our old friends in a different company.

“So, how did you recognize me?”, I asked Vasuki.

“Oh! I see you in the Facebook posts all the time!”

“Ah! There is something to advertisement, then!!”

The irony is, a few minutes back, when I was walking away after dinner, I had thrown a glance at a table on the other side. A lady I had befriended in the hotel bus sitting next to me was sitting there having dinner when I had walked in. I had re-exchanged pleasantries as I walked to the bar.

I was going to wish her good night. She was not there. Two Indian guys were sitting there having a drink and discussing something.

I went past them.

IT WAS THEM!!!

Holy macro! I need to start paying attention to strangers!

That was a great start to what promises to be a very long driving weekend!

20 November 2024

The conversations that I have with these two

Came back from office to this sight.

“How was the day?”, I asked the dogs.

“Sofa. So good!” they said.

Apparently they have figured out that the new robot vacuum cannot climb up the sofa.

Jay Jay – allegedly a mix of two hunter breeds – is furthest away from the floor perched in the highest spot. Bogga at least is watching the vacuum with mild curiosity. Jay Jay, on the other hand, is utterly contented with his solution.

20 November 2024

Book Review: The Unaccountability Machine by Dan Davies

“Why big systems make terrible decisions – and how the world lost its mind”

This is a freshly published book (just came out a few months back) and still not available in the digital version. I had to get my hard copy delivered from Great Britain.

It is a fairly dense and interesting book.

It basically establishes the concept of “accountability sinks”. How post war, certain systems came of being where effective walls were built such that no one could be held accountable. It starts with the story of the airline passenger who got bumped off his seat but cannot talk to any manager because it is not there in their “policies”. By citing something as a “policy”, management can effectively shirk from accountability that is required in exception cases. (Policies are still required for 99.99% of the cases).

It talks of how the financial system has effectively created many accountability sinks which has led it to behave for short term gains till the whole system collapses upon itself – as we have seen in the many financial crises and then the average taxpayer is left with the burden.

It talks about how government and politicians have created accountability sinks – e.g. different agencies, where any economic disaster can be blamed on the Fed (or central banks) whereas people vote their government directly to fix their problems in the economy.

The book shines a particular spotlight on how the Private Equity firms are creating havoc by behaving in a short term way by leveraging debt-laden buyouts. He points to how companies post war went from being a lot more employee and society conscious (they were big then too but short term profit was only one of the motives) to today’s world where shareholder value is the sole motive backed by Friedman’s philosophies.

He also directs a lot of his ire towards economists in general, Friedman in particular, who he says tries endlessly to fit the world into their pre-conceived models rather than the other way round.

He points out how globalization, outsourcing and such constructs completely broke down the information flow and led to further short term behaviors by companies.

Finally, he explains this rise of the investor class has created a deep schism in the society where nobody needs to take accountability for the real challenges of the common person. He points to how this has created a sense of helplessness and anger, how news channels like Fox figured out how to productize that rage and sell it and the eventual rise of populist leaders like Trump or Modi. This, he says is nothing but a cry from that populace for help.

Dan, an ardent student of cybernetics, uses a lot of concepts from the science of cybernetics (which kind of faded away once technology took over) to explain how to think of what is happening in the various systems. I, for one, learnt the contribution of Stafford Beers for the first time. I loved one quote of Beers where he laments that when we discovered fast information processing systems like computers, instead of using that increased information flow to rethink systems (e.g. management structures) that were built in the previous two hundred years, we applied them to do accounting (crunch numbers). He compares this to getting Einstein, Feynman and the likes to a room and see if they can figure out how to count sheep in a field faster than a shepherd can do today – or something like that!

Whether you agree to his views or not, the author will make you think. Again, a fairly deep book and deserving of a second read. But a dense book – especially the concepts of cybernetics needs careful understanding. So, give yourself some time if you pick this book up.

Category: Books | LEAVE A COMMENT
19 November 2024

Puzzle from real life – the coffee cleaning

Every couple of months or so, I face this dilemma. If you make your own cappuccino at home, you are familiar with the wand that heats and foams the milk. Now that wand has a head in the end which looks like the picture on your left. This has 4 small holes in the end – see middle picture. This is where the steam comes out from. Now, because it gets exposed to milk, from time to time it needs to be cleaned.

The cleaning instrument is a simple, small sharp needle – see picture on the right. All you have to do is put the needle in each of the four holes, give it a good spin and then at the end, soak it in water.

Now comes the problem. Once I have given one hole a good clean, I go to the next one. Once I am done with that, I get confused which one to go to next. Which one did I already do? Remember, there are no ways to identify a hole and I certainly do not want to put any scratches on the surface. If I do adjacent ones, for all you know, I have been doing the same two all the time. Because you are spinning the head, you are not sure your final orientation is the same the original one.

What might be a couple of tricks to make sure that with only four cleans, I get each one of them only once?

See answer here